Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
Angela 10:44, Nov 1, 2003 (UTC)
Most of your edits are nonsense, especially in the Star Wars Episode VIII article. There was no Chubacken character in that episode! I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you got confused, rather than vandalized. Remember, vandalism is not tolerated on wikipedia. I would suggest you check your edits, and their validity, BEFORE posting them. It's just common sense, something that your edits show you don't have. Thank you, --User:Lulurascal
the Battle Droid Depsencer is a descent article. its formated that way because there is not much info about it. User:Halo 31887
See Giffords talk page
Have some questions regarding your deletions from G. Giffords.
Well, yeah, I'm familiar with those thinkers obviously, but I was targeting the so-called "anarcho-capitalist" folks who I've been sparring with for over two years here. They also like to conflate 19th century American individualist anarchism with their own thought to make themselves seem more legitimate. --Tothebarricades 14:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Bkalafut, my name is Oscar and I´m from Mexico. I´m doing an english high school project that consists on doing an essay of the main characteristics of a foreign university. First of all,I would like to know if you are able to help me with the information I could need in this project. By the way, I will really appreciate your help, read you later...ciao. Yacopop 01:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)YacopopYacopop 01:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Friedman & Klein
Thanks. We disagree about whether Klein's criticism should be mentioned at all, but I think it fits well there. Possibly it'll profit from people shifting it around slightly now, but I think the inclusion should be enough to answer those who want a whole section on Klein. Cretog8 (talk) 03:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Suggesting Changes to Milton Friedman Article
I've requested a reassessment of the good article status of the Milton Friedman article based on lack of neutrality, and have added a POV tag to the article. Please join the discussion, if you are interested. Thanks. Jdstany (talk) 03:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Fred Singer, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 13:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out with reporting vandalism. As you may know since you've been here since 2003, Twinkle is a very fast and very easy way of warning and reporting vandalism. It takes only 3 clicks to install. Thank you! – Tommy [message] 22:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Removal of category on Boston T. Party article
I'd say that his book "Hologram of Liberty" is ABSOLUTELY political theory.
Re: Another Mises Inst. vanity page for deletion
This is in regards to this edit. You are probably unaware of this, but an article tags sanction has been placed on our climate change articles. BTW, the reason why the POV dispute appears stale is that there is a massive arbitration case going on and ArbCom has asked editors to take a break from editing CC articles and others have signed up to a voluntary restriction. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. A Horse called Man 20:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Islam and antisemitism. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)