Talk:Nacho King!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


from VfD:

A nacho kiosk franchise in the Philippines that again, has mastered the art of google bombing. Is an unkonwn nacho franchise notable enough for an encyclopedia? --Viriditas 11:42, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep. Seems to be a legitimate company. It may only get sixty[1] or so hits but please keep in mind that even a large company in the Philippines may not get as many hits as a small company in the US or UK. -JCarriker 12:33, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. --Improv 18:45, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Advert. Gwalla | Talk 22:08, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, promotional, no evidence of notability given. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:58, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Advertising. If it's a large company, that's ok, but the article here is an ad. What is unique about this Nacho king, and isn't it Nacho King? And how many other companies and food stands call themselves Nacho King, or Nacho Royale, or Nacho du Roi, or Nacho du Roi avec frommage? Geogre 18:13, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
    • The article should be located at Nacho King!, which is the company's actual name, and the company is a large company in the Phillapines. I'd move the article there, delete notice and all, and begin work on achieving NPOV but I'm not sure what the guidlines for that would be. -JCarriker 05:14, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)
      • That's fine IMO.In fact I've done the move myself. The reason we have the five day delay is to give people the chance to improve articles so that they don't need to be deleted. Theresa Knott (The torn steak) 23:44, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ambi 04:29, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Neutral. Just wanted to point out that it's 345 Google hits, and the company does seem to be large. I'm not sure where that places it in terms of notability. JCarriker makes a good point about large/small companies in Philippines/US/UK. func(talk) 01:43, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
    • I'm going to go ahead and give this a relatively weak Keep. In its current state, it doesn't read like an advert, and it does seem large-ish, (as far as Text Mex/Philipino/Mall fast food joints seem to go). func(talk) 23:14, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Nacho nacho king. I want to be a nacho king. Delete. Gamaliel 19:10, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Ad-speak removed, and the language/political barrier does have an affect on the google test. Keep weird little company (Tex-Mex in the Philippines?) -- Cyrius| 23:52, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)


This article has been substantially rewritten. The advert language about franchises has been removed and points about notability have been addressed. -JCarriker 23:06, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)

  • Well in that case keep Theresa Knott (The torn steak) 23:40, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • keep: notable after additions. Whosyourjudas (talk) 23:51, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. This article contains sufficient evidence of its notability. Acegikmo1 04:28, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Not the most useful piece of info here, but no reason to delete (unless we need to conserve disk space or something). zoney talk 09:08, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

WP:FOOD Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)